{section: How to limit memory usage of jobs}
 
-Known to work with Condor version: 7.0
+Known to work with HTCondor version: 7.0
 
-Condor monitors the total virtual memory usage of jobs.  This includes both physical RAM and disk-based virtual memory allocated by the job.  Administrators often want to limit the amount of physical RAM used by the job so that it doesn't cause performance problems for other jobs or tasks on the computer.  This is difficult to do in a general way, because Condor currently lacks a way to measure how much physical RAM the application actually needs verses how much of its memory could be swapped out to the disk without impacting performance.  (How much the application actually needs is known as the working set size.)
+HTCondor monitors the total virtual memory usage of jobs.  This includes both physical RAM and disk-based virtual memory allocated by the job.  Administrators often want to limit the amount of physical RAM used by the job so that it doesn't cause performance problems for other jobs or tasks on the computer.  This is difficult to do in a general way, because HTCondor currently lacks a way to measure how much physical RAM the application actually needs verses how much of its memory could be swapped out to the disk without impacting performance.  (How much the application actually needs is known as the working set size.)
 
-Example: Condor may see that the virtual memory size of a job is 1.5GB when there is only 1GB per slot on the 4 core system.  This could be a problem if jobs on the other slots need their full 1GB of expected memory.  However, it may be that there simply isn't demand for memory at the moment, so the operating system is letting this job keep more of its memory in physical RAM than it actually needs.  If something else comes along and demands more memory, the memory usage of this job might painlessly shift so that only 1.0GB is in physical RAM and the other 0.5GB is on disk, leaving the expected amount of RAM for other jobs without causing poor performance due to thrashing (actively needed data jumping back and forth between disk and RAM).
+Example: HTCondor may see that the virtual memory size of a job is 1.5GB when there is only 1GB per slot on the 4 core system.  This could be a problem if jobs on the other slots need their full 1GB of expected memory.  However, it may be that there simply isn't demand for memory at the moment, so the operating system is letting this job keep more of its memory in physical RAM than it actually needs.  If something else comes along and demands more memory, the memory usage of this job might painlessly shift so that only 1.0GB is in physical RAM and the other 0.5GB is on disk, leaving the expected amount of RAM for other jobs without causing poor performance due to thrashing (actively needed data jumping back and forth between disk and RAM).
 
-This is an area we hope to improve in Condor.  In the mean time, here are some recipes that have proven useful, even though they are not perfect.
+This is an area we hope to improve in HTCondor.  In the mean time, here are some recipes that have proven useful, even though they are not perfect.
 
 
 {subsection: How to preempt (evict) jobs that use too much memory}
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 
 {endcode}
 
-Note that preempted jobs will go back to idle in the job queue and will potentially try to run again if they can match to a machine.  If you instead wish to put the jobs on hold when they are evicted, either use the submit-side policy described later or, in Condor 7.3+, use the expression WANT_HOLD.  One advantage of using WANT_HOLD -vs- the submit-side policy example below is the startd will evaluate these attributes much more frequently than updates are sent to the schedd. An example using WANT_HOLD :
+Note that preempted jobs will go back to idle in the job queue and will potentially try to run again if they can match to a machine.  If you instead wish to put the jobs on hold when they are evicted, either use the submit-side policy described later or, in HTCondor 7.3+, use the expression WANT_HOLD.  One advantage of using WANT_HOLD -vs- the submit-side policy example below is the startd will evaluate these attributes much more frequently than updates are sent to the schedd. An example using WANT_HOLD :
 
 {code}
 VIRTUAL_MEMORY_AVAILABLE_MB = (VirtualMemory*0.9)
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
 
 {subsection: How to place a hard limit on memory usage by a job in unix}
 
-Condor doesn't currently provide a configuration setting for this, but you can write your own wrapper script that runs before the job and sets resource limits that are enforced by the operating system.  Here is what you put in the configuration file of your execute machines:
+HTCondor doesn't currently provide a configuration setting for this, but you can write your own wrapper script that runs before the job and sets resource limits that are enforced by the operating system.  Here is what you put in the configuration file of your execute machines:
 
 {code}
 USER_JOB_WRAPPER = /path/to/condor_job_wrapper